Advantages and Disadvantages of Partnership Working in Health and Social Care

Better results in partnership can be achieved if resources are well shared by partners. For example, in the case of Adult A, a better outcome could have been achieved if police, local authorities, and health and social services had shared their resources to care for Adult A. Therefore, better results for the partnership can be achieved by creating a framework for sharing available resources among partners. Reduced duplication of work in assessments and services. A better understanding of team roles and contribution to care. Improved job satisfaction for volunteers and professionals. In order for the service user to participate in its maintenance and decision-making, several contact options must be used, including listening to the decisions of service users, service user communities, representatives of service users, ensuring that an effective complaint procedure is followed and self-defense groups (Connors and Maclean, 2012). Partnership work can create barriers to joint decision-making when some practitioners feel that their role is threatened and their professional status is neglected. Clarifying roles and tasks at work can help reduce this barrier (Ministry of Health, 1998).

Working in partnership is important for everyone involved and can bring many benefits. These benefits include the fact that working in partnership can improve the service user experience by removing barriers between the service user and the provider, enabling open communication, and responding to the wishes of service users. It also makes it possible to provide the service more effectively by providing holistic care by working with the individual and their family to meet their social needs and individual choices that can be understood and applied through care plans. Working with external organizations allows service users to meet the broader needs of service users (Connors & Maclean, 2012). Possible outcomes of partnership for service users: The results have both the negative and positive aspects of partnerships. The Two are as follows: The Crime and Disorder Act of 1998 was adopted to combat crimes related to anti-social behaviour. While this law requires local authorities to develop a strategy that reduces crime and disorder in their area, it also requires them to work with local law enforcement, health and social services. Residents and businesses to ensure that crime and disorder are avoided. Unfortunately, in the case of Adult A, the local authority did not fulfill its mandate because it did not work in partnership with the police, the health and social authority and local residents (neighbours) to prevent the frequent harm inflicted on Adults A. If she had worked in partnership with local residents, police, and health and social services, Adult A could have been better protected from harm.

Under the Health and Social Welfare Act 2012 (Sections 13N and 14Z1), the NHS has a duty to promote and ensure integrated care when it improves the quality of services and reduces inequalities in access to services or improves outcomes. Unified Model: In the Unified Model, the management structure includes management, staffing and employee training. There are no separate structures or areas for these activities (Morris, 1997). The main objective of the structure is to distribute integrated services to those who need them. Residential care may include this model as an organizational structure. The main advantages of this structure are as follows: when partnership cooperation is established in the health and social sector, many challenges arise and it is necessary to face these challenges and solve them instead of avoiding them. A damage control system must be in place when structural and procedural changes occur during the partnership between health organizations, and it is also necessary to coordinate activities among employees so that they do not feel alienated in the new structure. They noted that intersectoral partnerships are essential to engage in community decision-making and planning, the establishment of health facilities, the mobilization of political commitment, resources and infrastructure, and the relevance of health promotion initiatives in the socio-cultural context. According to Glasby and Littlechild (2004), there are 5 main barriers to effective partnership work. These contain structural barriers due to the way responsibilities and roles are distributed between and within the boundaries of the organization. Procedural barriers can be caused by differences in planning and budgeting cycles across agencies. Financial barriers may arise from differences in funding.

Professional barriers can be created due to differences in ideologies, values and professional interests. Perceived threats are also another obstacle to working in partnership because of their status, autonomy and legitimacy. There is a wide range of strategies that can be used to improve the outcomes of the partnership with health care and social services. This includes improving communication, creating a framework for resource sharing The following presentation from the College of Social Work (currently known as the British Association of Social Workers or BASW) discusses how the law affects integration, collaboration and partnerships in the UK, including: 1.3 Explaining how barriers to working in partnership can be overcome. According to Jo Tunnard, former Deputy Director of the Child Poverty Action Group and current Social Advisor: The Health and Social Services Partnership Model describes the structure of the organization. There are different models of partnership in the areas of health and social services. The nursing residency model is as follows: Collaboration between agencies is seen as a way to improve primary mental health care. Indeed, it can improve access to services and reduce service gaps [1]; Reduce health costs by using existing resources and reducing duplication of services [2] and improving equal opportunities in service delivery [3]. We discussed the various barriers and outcomes of the partnership in the area of health and social services. There are ways to convert some of the negative results into positive ones and improve the overall results. Some of them are mentioned below: In addition, working in partnership allows for safe and effective guidelines for privacy and information exchange and professionals can trust knowledge and experience. (Connors & Maclean, 2012) In addition, caregivers play an important role in partnership work, it is important that health professionals recognize this, because over the past 20 years, there has been a growing recognition that caring for home service users has a positive impact on health and recovery.

For this reason, it is important that caregivers are involved in decisions regarding the care of service users. .